- #Do you need a mac for adobe premiere upgrade
- #Do you need a mac for adobe premiere full
- #Do you need a mac for adobe premiere pro
- #Do you need a mac for adobe premiere software
If you can’t or don’t want to upgrade your applications to current versions, you should delay upgrading to Big Sur. Because of changes and tighter requirements by both Apple and Adobe, a much smaller number of old applications are going to run in macOS 11 Big Sur than in past upgrades. If you decide to go ahead, you’ll want to run the most current version of Creative Cloud applications on the new system.
#Do you need a mac for adobe premiere software
Here’s the short version: As with most macOS major upgrades, it’s best to wait until all of the software you use is properly updated for it. Apple 13.With the announcement of macOS 11 Big Sur, you’re probably wondering if your Adobe software will work in this macOS upgrade.If you need a Mac today then the affordable price point of the M1 Macs is impressive, but you should probably hold out if you can. Plus, if you have any of the more problematic cameras or work often with that footage you are better off waiting for the next generation of software improvements or hardware. Resolve and Final Cut are still far ahead when it comes to performance on the M1 Macs.
#Do you need a mac for adobe premiere pro
It starts off okay, but then completely falls off performance-wise and becomes an unplayable mess.įor Premiere Pro the native version is still not ideal. Previously this would barely playback at all. Editing is still feasible with reduced resolutions, but it’s going to take some time on the export.įinally, the last test is footage from the Canon R5 – apparently the hardest footage to use on Premiere with the M1 Mac. This put more pressure on the CPU compared to the GPU and ended up taking a lot more time. The GPU is a limiting factor here and a dedicated GPU will likely be a benefit to you.Ĭanon RAW from the C200 was an interesting flip. Export times are no different between the Beta and standard versions of Premiere.
#Do you need a mac for adobe premiere full
Even going to half resolution isn’t quite at the full 24fps. Playback definitely isn’t great, running about half speed when playing at full resolution. For 10-bit H.265 where you don’t have the same exact hardware encoding you actually don’t see much improvement over the Beta version.įor some more fun Max pulled in some RED RAW footage. The M1 Mac clocked in at 7 minutes and 19 seconds – nearly half the speed of the Beta version of Premiere. The next test does a similar export but with H.265/HEVC footage. It’s certainly better now, but Max points out that it isn’t as good as fully optimized software like Final Cut or even Resolve which does the same job in 3-5 minutes. Compared to a non-optimized version of Premiere which finished in ~13 minutes this is noticeable faster.Īnd the Intel MacBook clocked in at 18 minutes. A 5 minute 8-bit H.264 clip exported in 9 minutes and 10 seconds. Moving to a render test you will see that the GPU is being totally hit and fully used.
Heading to half resolution – which is likely for a laptop display – you will get perfect playback and have some headroom. It was close, but capping out at 25-26 fps for a 30p clip. When moving to playback tests the full 4K playback did hit up against the limits of the GPU. It runs at just under 2 minutes today and there is likely room for even more optimal speed. Working with HEVC/H.265 footage Premiere can now take advantage of the M1’s hardware processing. Current Premiere Pro took just 50 seconds, which is an improvement of 11 seconds over the Beta and over 4-5 minutes over the 16” Intel-based MacBook Pro. The 20 second clip took no time to stabilize on the M1 Mac and it only used about 50% of the CPU. Kicking things off is stabilizing a 4K image. All the M1 Macs should perform similarly. Let’s see where Max found benefits and drawbacks.Īll these tests were performed using a base 13.3” M1 MacBook Pro. Hardware optimizations make certain tasks a breeze and software has made things a lot better. There is no doubt that it is the start of something that will shape the future of computers.
The M1 chip is an impressive piece of engineering and design. It’s super interesting to see just how good (or bad) the M1 Macs are doing today as it is likely to only get better with more software tweaks and next-gen hardware on the horizon. These updates do mean that a ton of video editors can now enjoy full-speed performance on the latest Macs with their NLE of choice.įor a more nuanced investigation into whether M1 Macs are suitable for video editing in Premiere, filmmaker Max Yuryev has taken a much closer look. Now it’s because some major software support has just landed with Adobe Premiere Pro gaining M1 enhancements. Ah, the seemingly endless conversation on Apple Silicon continues to rage.
0 kommentar(er)
